![]() The term "hermaphroditic" is broadly used here to indicate sexual deviance from the normal condition in any two or more of the following ways: (a) external genital morphology (b) internal accessory reproductive structures (c) hormonal sex and secondary sexual characteristics (d) gonadal sex: and (e) chromosomal sex. Particular attention was given to those patients classified as sexually precocious or as hermaphroditic. The content of their articles details clinical examinations, descriptions, interviews, and therapy of various individuals with sexual abnormalities. ![]() Within two years these investigators had produced a book and almost a dozen papers (see list of literature). Starting in 1955, articles written by John Money and Joan and John Hampson, either in collaboration or separately, began to appear with regularity. What is surprising, however, is a certain direction this development has taken and the relative ease with which one view has been accepted. This in itself is not surprising in view of the greater all-round interest in the psychological field coupled with the increased publicity given to studies bearing on sexual behavior. INTRODUCTIONĪ review of the many areas pertinent to the field of sexual behavior over the last decade reveals the development and elaboration of various psychosexual medical aspects. and neural indications for sexual predisposition (d) refuting the extent of imprinting involved in humans and (e) showing the futility of separating "nurture" from "nature" in reference to the role of learning and acquisition of a gender role. This article defends the view of inherent somatic sexuality organizing man's psychosexual development by: (a) reviewing man's place on the evolutionary continuum, and the broad base of sexual behavior within which this discussion must be considered (b) presenting normative, clinical and anthropological evidence inferring a particular sexual predilection at birth (c) showing genetic, hormonal. This theory is derived from clinical observations of individuals manifesting morphological sexual incongruities (hermaphrodites, pseudohermaphrodites, etc.). Recent attempts to alter this conception and to explain psychosexual maturation as developing from a neutral rather than a sexual base are here reviewed and criticized.Įssentially, a psychosexual neutrality-at-birth theory holds that male and female patterns of sexual orientation and behavior are attributable exclusively to learning or imprinting phenomena. The classical view of human sexuality holds that man is invested with a particular sex within which he, as an individual, develops.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |